|
Criteria
|
5
Excellent
|
3
Fair
|
1
Needs Improvement
|
Score
|
|
Goal and
Learning
Objective
|
Learning
Objective was clear and
provided
opportunity for higher thinking
|
Some objectives were found and few critical
thinking was used
|
Game Objective was to easy and required little thinking skill
|
3
|
|
Content Area
|
Game was well stated and clear of its purpose
|
Moderate information was given and presented
|
Content area was unclear and vague
information was given
|
5
|
|
Navigation
|
Game was organized and easy to navigate
|
Faced few navigation
errors, resulting in student getting lost
|
Navigation was confusing and unclear of instructions
|
5
|
|
Engagement and Motivation
|
Game was engaging and something I
would like to play again
|
Game was somewhat
engaging and enjoyable
|
Game was too boring and lacks motivation
|
3
|
|
Creativity and Design
|
Multiple visual aide in layout.
Design elements were able to assist in
understanding the concept.
|
Some creativity used to make
game appealing and somewhat
understand the game concept.
|
Little creativity to understand the
game concept.
|
3
|
|
Possible Points
|
25
|
|
Total
|
19
|
Rating
Value
|
25-20
|
|
19-11
|
|
10-1
|
EXCELLENT
FAIR
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Reference
Retrieved
September 23,2018
https://www.csus.edu/indiv/k/kaym/rubric/edgamesrubric.html
Hi:
ReplyDeleteThis BLOG post could use a little more formatting assistance.
-j-